Comments on: WHY IS THIS NEWS? [The media's obsession with Obama]

By: Hannah

Hannah — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:50:01 +0000

Actually PETA did have something to say about it, Alan.

By: Alan

Alan — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:35:50 +0000

Yeah, where is PETA in all of this? They would be all over anyone else for swatting that fly. I guess they’re keeping their mouth shut because it’s all about money. Obama is more likely to tip the pot of government cash in their direction than any president we’ve had in the history of America. And if you think I’m being ridiculous, you should look up some of the things they have gone bonkers over in the past. It will make you laugh, but also feel frustrated at the elementary school logic of an organization that actually influences national leaders in their policy decisions.

By: Lance

Lance — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:32:54 +0000

What's really ridiculous is the fact that every obscure group or organization has to have an opinion over the fly killing. Yes, I'm speaking to you PETA!

By: Jonathan Postlewaite

Jonathan Postlewaite — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:19:44 +0000

In that same interview, Obama was very critical of Fox News. My wife was very disturbed by the way it seems Obama is saying to the media “you’re either for me or against me, and to be against me is not good and/or beneficial” because it reminded her of how things were in Cuba when she visited.

By: steve greenwood

steve greenwood — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:08:48 +0000

Don’t get me started. It’s objective reporting like this that will pretty much guarantee a second term for President Obama. Unless he swats a small child like he swatted that fly, they’ll never run anything that makes him look less than messianic. Yes, I meant to leave the ‘m’ lower case.